This is a working list of constructive criticisms of the DNCC Blogger Credentialing process in 2008.

Top Five Criticisms / Suggestions

1. A process for picking bloggers that was completely non-transparent was certain to case dissension among a group of people who spend most of their time fighting for more transparent processes in government.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Bloggers who Support this Feedback Project
Steve Hanson - Wisconsin - Uppity Wisconsin - http://uppitywis.org

{formula: Name, State, Blog, URL}


Quotes from Bloggers:

Formula: 2 to 3 sentence quote in quotations marks followed by Name, State, Blog and url.

"Feedback. Cricitism. Feedback"
Paul Smith, California, Smithblog, smithblog.com

"I think it would be an interesting process if in the future the state blogging community were to be given some form of input into the selection process. The current process (whatever it actually is) is certain to cause hard feelings - transparency and participation are essential."
Steve Hanson, Wisconsin, Uppity Wisconsin, http://uppitywis.org


Page Information

  • 4 months ago [history]
  • View page source
  • You're not logged in
  • No tags yet learn more

Wiki Information

Recent PBwiki Blog Posts